Exegetical Fallacies, 2nd Edition. by: D. A. Carson D. A. Carson (PhD, University of Cambridge) is emeritus professor of New Testament at Trinity Evangelical. “In short, this is an amateur’s collection of exegetical fallacies” (p). In this book, D.A. Carson seeks to reveal the numerous Exegetical Fallacies that occur from. This book offers updated explanations of the sins of interpretation to teach sound grammatical, lexical, cultural, theological, and historical Bible study practices.
|Published (Last):||21 May 2014|
|PDF File Size:||12.84 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.63 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This book is a must-read for any Bible teacher, Pastor, or anyone handling God’s word in any way.
He notes fallacies that his own seminary professors made. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston,7. But the hermeneutical process that the interpreter of the Bible engages in is highly influenced by their presuppositional and historical biases. Solid Christian book good read for anyone who wants to study the Bible in any way and especially if you want to explain it to others.
I’ve read This book is a handy summation of the major types of exegetical fallacies. Speculative reconstructions cannot overturn substantive evidence of history and cannot be used as an authoritative means for interpretation. Selected pages Title Page. Unwarranted Restriction of the Semantic Field— Limiting the semantic range of a word that ignores the full range exegefical possible meanings it can have.
The author presents fallacies caused by z lack or complete disregard of critical thought in the exegetical process. So phileo took on the meaning of kyneo.
Exegetical Fallacies, Second Edition
I can also hold the Word of Fallaceis more delicately, humbled at how hard it is to truly understand meaning through the distance of time, language, and culture. You keep waiting for the, “Oh, I’m just kidding! Aug 07, Jordan Shirkman rated it it was amazing.
The only part I thought D. The Article— Interpreting the meaning and use of the Greek article in terms of the English article. My favorite chapters were on logical fallacies and historical and presuppositional fallacies. He also shows how our interpretation of history can be muddled up under the historical fallacies. It is filled with dry wit. It is the responsibility of the exegete to distinguish these differences and to avoid logical leaps that are unfounded.
Exegetical Fallacies – D. A. Carson – Google Books
The treatments of New Testament carskn of the Old and the rise of Structuralism do little more than alert the reader to the existence fqllacies an issue, though to his credit, he directs the reader to sources for additional information regarding structuralism and the process of distinguishing figurative and literal linguistic uses. Because it is not meant to teach how to exegete, it must follow instruction from other sources. My library Help Advanced Book Search. Even so, an exceptional book on its subject and great book otherwise as well.
However, many sections were too technical for the average reader including those in ministry.
Want to Read saving…. Carson does a lovely job of presenting solid explanations and brief examples that are often helpful and rarely confusing. Problems Relating to the Semitic Background of the Greek New Testament— Imposing an overly close falalcies between a Semitic word and Greek equivalent without consulting the Hellenistic context of its usage.
In one form or another, each fallacy points to an erroneous assumption that ignores an established law of language. Jun 19, Jimmy added it. A few times during my read, I had to look up the meaning of a word or re-read a paragraph that went entirely over my head; for the most part, though, Exegetical Fallacies was an easy and light read, surprisingly fast-paced and enjoyable.
The chapter on Word Studies I found particularly helpful. I do not know if he dealt with all topics properly or if faklacies should have paid more attention to certain issues. Cavalier Dismissal— Assuming that an argument has been sufficiently answered when, in fact, it has just been written off and the interpretation redirected. User Review – Flag as inappropriate The author of this book is D. Other editions – View all Exegetical Fallacies D.
Much of the word study and grammatical discussion is hard to follow because I don’t know the original Biblical languages and am not studying in them.
Equivocal Argumentation— Overreaching the implications of an argument beyond what it proves so as to make the argument seem conclusive or decisive on some level. Root Fallacy— Determining the meaning of a word based solely or primarily on its etymology. Carson seeks to reveal the numerous Exegetical Fallacies that occur from the pulpit.
It is here where the sobering remarks most prominently affect the reader’s heart and make him examine himself or herself more carefully when doing the task of exegesis or just the task of trying to understand God’s Word, period.
Jul 04, Andrew Bondurant rated it really liked it. I can now read more skeptically various commentaries and Sunday school lessons that I look to exegegical insight.